I love the Bible.

I never do anything for money; I get paid a lot of money as a by-product.

I think extremists within the base may very well move the Democratic party away from its pro-Israel position.

I think there would be less torture with a warrant requirement than without one.

I understand that it's good tactics to categorize me as a close-minded, unobjective extremist, but nobody that respects me has those views.

I was a Jewish rabbinical student for 12 years, and studied the Bible all the time.

I was critical of race-based affirmative action early on in my career and I've changed my mind. And I've publicly acknowledged that I was wrong.

I've always worked.

Israel can't make peace without the clear support of the United States.

Most liberal democracies don't try to figure out what the truth is.

My goal is always to keep support for Israel a bi-partisan issue and never make a national election any kind of referendum on Israel.

The Internet knows no national borders.

Well you know, all law is about injustice.

Well, first of all, no professor should be able to say, I refuse to defend my position. I refuse to debate my position.

You're absolutely right: Bob Grant is a racist, Bob Grant is a bigot, he's a despicable talk show host and I agree with that.

I think mistakes are the essence of science and law. It's impossible to conceive of either scientific progress or legal progress without understanding the important role of being wrong and of mistakes.

If you're a prosecutor, and you believe the defendant is guilty, you only talk about ultimate truth, but not intermediate truth. If you're the defense attorney, you care deeply about intermediate truth, but you tend to neglect ultimate truth.

It simply cannot be disputed that for decades the Palestinian leadership was more interested in there not being a Jewish state than in there being a Palestinian state.

We don't have an Official Secrets Act in the United States, as other countries do. Under the First Amendment, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and freedom of association are more important than protecting secrets.

You can't think about terrorism without thinking about Palestinian terrorism. Palestinians began international terrorism. It started with them in 1968. They used it as the first resort, not the last resort. They invented it, they perfected it, they benefited from it and they taught the world how to use it and that it would be successful.