I think it's a very firm part of human nature that if you surround yourself with like-minded people, you'll end up thinking more extreme versions of what you thought before.

I strongly believe that the Second Amendment creates an individual right to possess and use guns for purposes of both hunting and self-defense.

I'm interested in how the Internet spreads information.

This part of the 21st century is preoccupied with risk, and there's a lot that law can do to make lives longer and healthier.

The U.S. is blessed with tremendously creative and imaginative law students at places like Chicago, Harvard, Columbia and Yale.

As a matter of history, the Fourteenth Amendment was not understood to ban segregation on the basis of race.

I am a huge Red Sox fan.

I think that every state in the union should recognize same-sex marriage.

I would reject the distinction between a Keynesian moment and a behavioral moment.

If there's a regulation that's saving 10,000 lives and costing one job, it's worth it.

It's hard to get me out of the office.

Liberals are sometimes defined as people who can't take their own side in an argument.

The 'cash for clunkers' program was a big success in part because it gave people the sense that the economy was moving.

There is no proportional representation requirement in the Equal Protection Clause.

We ought to ban hunting, I suggest, if there isn't a purpose other than sport and fun. That should be against the law. It's time now.

Catholicism is a wide tent in terms of political and legal positions. We could have nine Catholics on the Supreme Court and a great deal of diversity toward the law.

Democrats want to use government power to make people's lives go better; Republicans respond that people know more than politicians do. We think that both might be able to agree that nudging can maintain free markets, and liberty, while also inclining people in good directions.

If I may discuss the idea of explosion. The number of regulations issued in the last two years is approximately the same as the number issued in the last two years of the Bush administration.

Most problems are best solved privately, not through government. There's a problem of discourtesy in the world, which is best handled through social norms, which are indispensable. But you wouldn't want the government to be mandating courtesy.

There are some lawyers who think of themselves as basically instruments of whoever their clients are, and they pride themselves on their professional craft.